An overview of the justification for existence of objective moral principles in ethics

He prefers to think of the extinction of species and destruction of ecosystems in anthropocentric, rather than in biocentric or ecocentric terms. Thus, it would be unfair and anachronistic to criticize his reverence-for-life ethic for being largely irrelevant to the set of problems constituting the environmental crisis.

There are, then, only two ways to be justified: Analogously, someone can be justified in believing a claim out of one contrast class, even if the same person is not justified in believing the same claim out of a different contrast class.


Edwin Mellen Press, Plato seems to sidestep his own insight that all human beings have an immortal soul and have to take care of it as best they can, as he not only demands in the Phaedo but is going to confirm in a fanciful way in the Myth of Er at the end of Republic Book X.

Nature permits the most horrible cruelties. Similarly, some social policies forbid residents in certain neighborhoods from having yard sales. Ecofeminists have also sharply criticized Deep Ecology because it seems to "totalize" and "colonize" the "other" Cheney; Plumwood.

It is a single, self-evident principle of reason that he calls the "categorical imperative. The outcome here is less clear, and the woman would need to precisely calculate the overall benefit versus disbenefit of her action.

Divine Command Theory

Issues in Applied Ethics As noted, there are many controversial issues discussed by ethicists today, some of which will be briefly mentioned here. Unlike machines and other purposeful artifacts that we design to serve our own ends, organisms are ends-in-themselves.

They are to be selected through tests of intelligence and character from among the soldiers, to identify individuals who are unshakable in their conviction that their own well-being is intimately tied to that of the city. While Rolston is very careful not to buck prevailing scientific opinion on the sort of reality possessed by species, ecosystems, and evolutionary processes, his argument that intrinsic value exists objectively in nature does buck more general assumption of modern science.

Such moral power is not available to human beings, because only God has such moral authority by virtue of the divine nature. For instance, to understand what it is to be a triangle, it is necessary — inter alia — to understand the nature of points, lines, planes and their interrelations.

Includes study of applied ethics Logic — study of good reasoningby examining the validity of arguments and documenting their fallacies Metaphysics — study of the state of being and the nature of reality Fields of philosophy[ edit ] Aesthetics[ edit ] Aesthetics is study of the nature of beauty, art, and taste, and the creation of personal kinds of truth Applied aesthetics — application of the philosophy of aesthetics to art and culture Epistemology[ edit ] Epistemology is the study of knowledge.

God created us with a certain nature. And upon the existence of intrinsic value in nature he founds our duties to the natural world in all its aspects.

An important objection to the foregoing points is that there is something inadequate about a punishment and reward orientation of moral motivation. Analyzing 11 specific virtues, Aristotle argued that most virtues fall at a mean between more extreme character traits.

One response is to say that God is subject to moral principles in the same way that he is subject to logical principles, which nearly all agree does not compromise his sovereignty See The Omnipotence Objection below.

What grounded this decision? Johnson, however, provides no principle or method for hierarchically ordering interests and the beings who possess them; nor does he provide an ethical procedure for adjudicating conflicts of interest between people, animals, and plants, and, more difficult still, between all such individuals and environmental wholes.

The misuse of rhetoric is exemplified by the speech attributed to the orator Lysias, a somewhat contrived plea to favor a non-lover rather than a lover.

The distinctions that Socrates subsequently introduces in preparation of his last proof of the immortality of the soul seem, however, to provide some information about the procedure in question d—b.

Moral Skepticism

Still, they do not go on to make the opposite claim that moral knowledge is impossible. But one can at least hope rationally to decide, in circumstances of hard choice, which of several relevant but conflicting duties is the most pressing because they can all be expressed in comparable and commensurable terms.

If knowledge implies truth, and if moral claims are never true, then there is no knowledge of what is moral or immoral assuming that skeptics deny the same kind of truth that knowledge requires.

Through practice as well as study, we should cultivate a palpable sense of identification with the world. Rolston is prepared to invoke his hierarchical arrangement of intrinsically valuable kinds of beings to resolve biocentric moral conundrums.The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to philosophy.

Philosophy – study of general and fundamental problems concerning matters such as existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language. It is distinguished from other ways of addressing fundamental questions (such as mysticism, myth, or the arts) by its. Intimately associated with this "Cartesian" moral psychology are such commonplaces of modern Western ethics as universal application of abstract principles and rules, impartiality, objectivity, rights, and the victory of synoptic and dispassionate reason over myopic and prejudicial feelings.

Evolutionary ethics is a field of inquiry that explores how evolutionary theory might the question of whether objective moral values exist, and the possibility of objective moral knowledge.

what is morally right or wrong, but it might be able to illuminate our use of moral language, or to cast doubt on the existence of objective moral.

“Moral Skepticism” names a diverse collection of views that deny or raise doubts about various roles of reason in morality. Different versions of moral skepticism deny or doubt moral knowledge, justified moral belief, moral truth. Divine Command Theory.

Philosophers both past and present have sought to defend theories of ethics that are grounded in a theistic framework. Roughly, Divine Command Theory is the view that morality is somehow dependent upon God, and that moral obligation consists in obedience to God’s Command Theory.

Ethics: a general introduction

An Overview of the Introductory Material: The Main Topics 1. The Origin of Philosophy 2. Ethics as a Branch of Philosophy The Relation between God and Objective Moral Values Are There Revealed Truths? 3. If we can acquire such knowledge, what basic moral principles are in fact the correct ones?

(2) Questions of Analysis 1. What .

An overview of the justification for existence of objective moral principles in ethics
Rated 3/5 based on 68 review