This reflects a belief in a hierarchy of moral standing with more complex animals at the top and microorganisms and plants at the bottom. This means reducing pain and suffering as much as possible.
The scientific community has often been the driving force for these improvements, arguing that better conditions for animals was conducive to better, more replicable, scientific results. Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
Providing high quality, disease-free environments for the animals will help ensure that every animal counts.
Hills concludes with a graded scale of animals rights. The ethics of research involving animals. Animal rights philosophy is distinct from proponents of animal welfare who argue that we must provide adequate conditions for animals in our care — a position held by the RSPCA among others.
The strongest pro animal rights answer to this question would be that non-human animals have exactly the same moral status as humans and are entitled to equal treatment. Extensive literature searches, for instance, can ensure that experiments are not unnecessarily replicated and can ensure that animal models are only used to obtain information not already available in the scientific community.
In modern times, the question has shifted from whether animals have moral status to how much moral status they have and what rights come with that status. Also, anyone who handles the animals should be properly trained.
One philosophical position actually accepts those consequences and argues that those humans have the exact same rights or lack of rights as non-human animals.
Although it looks at the whole issue, it pays particular attention to the ethics, specifically in chapter three. It is a useful book covering many issues of animal rights activism and philosophy.
In fact, some of them the infants will surely meet all of the criteria in the future. Another way to reduce animal use is to ensure that studies are conducted according to the highest standards and that all information collected will be useable.
When appropriate, anesthesia should be used; additionally, studies should have the earliest possible endpoints after which animals who will subsequently experience disease or suffering can be euthanized. The moral relevance of human intelligence.
In summary, defenders of animal experimentation argue that humans have higher moral status than animals and fundamental rights that animals lack.
An Odyssey with Animals. Proponents of the middle ground position usually advocate a few basic principals that they believe should always be followed in animal research.
They can feel pain and experience pleasure. University of California Press. This essay supports animal rights. One common form of this argument claims that moral status comes from the capacity to suffer or to enjoy life.Testing Animal Testing and Ethical Dilemma Introduction The rise in the consumer dominance has led the organizations to adopt the use of various artificially derived chemicals for use in production of Personal and Hygiene Goods.
Animal testing is an ethical dilemma because it is using other living creatures to benefit humanity, when they are incapable of giving consent. An Ethical Dilemma Essay Words | 7 Pages Swami, a professor at the University of Westminster, “animal testing, or animal research, refers to the use of animals in experiments within academic, research, or commercial establishments” (Christopher, ).
The Ethics of Animal Experimentation. By Stephanie Liou 06 Jul, Animal Research, On closer scrutiny, there exists a wide range of positions on the debate over the ethics of animal testing. The two views mentioned above represent two common positions at the opposing ends of the spectrum.
This essay defends animal experimentation. Animal Testing: A True Ethical Dilemma - Imagine a life locked away in a cage with no form of control on your existence. It’s cold, dark, and you are scared.
Animal Testing: A True Ethical Dilemma Essay Words | 7 Pages. is the life of a laboratory animal. Animal testing is the use of animals.Download